Among the numerous types of sharks, there are some common general characteristics. Sharks have rough skin that is covered with tiny teeth called dermal denticles. The dermal denticles point backwards and help the shark swim with less resistance and more fluidity. For centuries, this abrasive skin was used as sandpaper.

The teeth of a shark are disposable. The teeth are arranged in rows, and as the front row wears out, the back rows move forward to replace them. These replacements shift forward every few weeks.

Sharks are generally extremely adept at buoyancy control. They have very large livers that contain a large amount of oil, and this, along with their lightweight cartilage skeletons, helps them stay buoyant. Most sharks also stay in constant motion in order to keep water flowing through their gill slits, and this also helps them to stay afloat.

Most sharks are cold-blooded, but some species, such as the Mako and Porbeagle, are warm-blooded, which means they can control their own body temperatures. Some species are known to warm their body temperatures up to 10°C warmer than the temperature of the surrounding waters.

Sharks have a special sense called electrolocation, the ability to sense electrical signals in the water. Every living animal in the water emits electric signals around its body, which are called bioelectric potential. This bioelectric potential is even stronger around a cut in the flesh, and this puts an animal at higher visibility.While hunting, sharks hone in on electrical energy so that they can make a precise attack.

Electrolocation also helps sharks navigate over long distances, through multiple oceans and a diverse array of habitats. Sharks are known to travel up to 10,000 miles in straight lines while following magnetic fields, sometimes in the deep seas that provide no other navigational indicators (such as polarized light, wave cues, etc). Their sensitivity to electromagnetic fields is astounding. A shark can sense the electricity emitted by single battery in the sea from over a mile away!

Sharks have inhabited our seas for 450,000,000 years, since the time of the dinosaurs, but humans know comparatively little about them. Although many species have not been identified, there are currently over 450 known species of sharks.

What is overfishing?

Overfishing takes place when fish and other marine creatures are fished more quickly than they can reproduce and sustain their populations. To put it simply, taking too many fish out of the seas before new fish can be born to replace the ones that were caught.

What is so bad about overfishing?

Globally, 80 million metric tons of fish are caught annually, and if current trends continue, ocean ecosystems will be damaged irreversibly. Extracting too many fish from an ecosystem robs larger predator species of their food source and reduces their chances of survival. A depletion of one can put the whole food web at risk of collapse, and can lead to an overall degradation of an ecosystem. Worldwide, 90% of large predatory fish stocks are gone due to overfishing. The United Nations predicts that if current trends continue, global fish stocks will be extinct by the year 2048.

Some fisheries are completely depleted. The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that 90% of all fish stocks are either overexploited or fully exploited. The largest of bony fish, the Atlantic bluefin tuna, is heavily harvested for the global sushi market, to the point that its population has decreased by over 96% from unfished levels.

The depletion of fish stocks means a risk of losing a valuable food source that many depend upon for economical and dietary reasons. Nearly two-thirds of the world’s population relies on fish for 40% of their protein. About 13,000,000 people depend on fishing for all or major part of their incomes. People dependent on fishing for their livelihoods face resource depletion, competition from industrial fishing fleets, and loss of traditional lifestyles.

What causes overfishing?

The global demand for seafood is on the rise, and global marine catch has quadrupled since the 1960s. The response to meet this increased demand has been the emergence of overly efficient industrial fishing practices. These practices are wasteful, unsustainable, and destructive, leaving harm in their tracks. The environmentally devastating thing about these fishing methods is that they destroy other species, catch more than they need, catch fish that people don’t want to eat, and are non-selective in their target fish.

The bycatch that results from industrial fishing methods is devastating. Bycatch any the accidental catch outside of the targeted species. Sharks, whales, dolphins, marine turtles, and seabirds are regularly caught as bycatch. 25% of all fish pulled from the sea never make it to the market and are thrown overboard, dead or soon to be dead.

Though climate change and global warming have been receiving much public attention in recent years, the interrelation between the oceans and the global climate is rarely recognized. The rainforests are often called “the lungs of the planet”, but few people realize that 70% of the oxygen we breathe comes from the seas. The Earth’s atmosphere and its oceans are entwined in a co-dependent bond.

In the coming 50 years, the Earth is expected to have temperatures and CO2 levels that are higher than those experienced in the past 500,000 years. Healthy oceans can act as a buffer for such rapid climate change; currently, oceans absorb nearly a third of all carbon emissions. In the past fifty years, the oceans have absorbed 90% of the heat caused by greenhouse gases. If this heat were to stay in the atmosphere, Earth’s ambient temperature would rise 3°C every decade.

Plastic is as common to see at the beach as seashells are, but plastic litter is more than just an aesthetic disturbance; it’s a sign that humans are treating the oceans like a garbage bin. Today, the oceans and marine life are facing the threat of permanent alteration from a number of sources of pollution, and plastic is among the most significant. Plastic accounts for 60-80% of marine garbage, and in high-density areas, reaches up to 95%. In the middle of the North Pacific, plastic outweighs surface zooplankton six to one.

The average American will throw away 185 pounds of plastic each year. And plastic never truly disappears. Every piece of plastic that has ever been made still exists. Even when burned, it breaks down into microscopic, toxic particles. Plastic is not a material that our planet can digest. Like diamonds, plastic is forever.

For example, when a plastic bottle is discarded improperly, rains and waterways may sweep it into a gutter and eventually out to sea. Floating at sea, the UV radiation of the sun makes the plastic brittle. The plastic breaks up into smaller pieces from the friction of the waves. In due course, the plastic breaks down into microplastic particles, which are fragments of plastic smaller than a grain of sand or the tip of a needle. Ocean currents sweep these microplastic particles to areas called gyres, where there are high concentrations of plastic.

Almost every marine organism is contaminated by plastic, from microscopic plankton to whales, the largest mammals on earth. Marine animals that become entangled in plastic may drown or starve. Plastic garbage may resemble food for some marine species. Turtles are known to mistake plastic bags for jellyfish. Sea birds selectively ingest specific colors of plastic, mistaking them for prey. Plastic is found in the stomachs of 85% of turtle species, 43% of seabird species, and 44% of marine mammals.

Eating plastic can hinder the secretion of gastric enzyme (which is needed for digestion) and cause the animal to starve.Other problems resulting from ingesting plastic are reproductive failure, lowered steroid levels, and delayed ovulation. Ingested plastic also introduces toxic pollutants, such as DDT and PCBs, into the animals’ bodies. The higher up the food chain a species is, the higher the amount of pollutants it will have. Thus, the bloodstreams and tissues of humans have very high levels of harmful chemicals leached by plastics. These chemicals are even found in newborns and in breast milk.

There are many areas of the oceans that are suffering from manmade habitat destruction, but coastal areas are disproportionately affected. Humans show a preference for living near water – nearly two-thirds of the world’s population lives within 60 km of a coast.

Coastal Development

As the global population grows, coastal land use and development increases. With development come far-reaching impacts on coastal ecosystems and the species dependent on them. Coastal areas are home to over 90% of all marine species, and these habitats are being lost at an alarming speed. Coastal habitats include estuaries, marshes, mangrove ecosystems, sea grass, and coral reef. These habitats serve as nurseries, breeding grounds, feeding spots, and the destruction of these habitats afflict repercussions to dependent species. An altered population structure of a species causes a domino effect throughout the whole chain web. And habitats don’t exist in isolation; most of them have inputs and outputs to other habitats that are, in turn, set off balance as well.

Industry

Escalating pressures to develop coastlines for industrial purposes are increasing the rate of habitat destruction. Some causes are poorly designed development projects for residential or and commercial establishments; shipping port construction; shipping operations such as dredging, levees, and breakwater structures; chemical runoff; oil and gas related activities, water pollution, and the alteration of freshwater inflows. Spills of crude oil change the population distribution of, or even kill, hundreds of marine species and leave a toxic environment that can persist for years. Oil sediment has been detected as much as thirty years after an oil spill. The Rena oil spill in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand killed an estimated 20,000 sea birds.

Another major ecological impact derives from the sediment remains of logging. When sediment loads enter the sea, it limits the penetration of the sunlight that primary and secondary producers need, thus modifies the whole food web. The sediment also smothers coral reefs and threatens dependent marine life. Coral reefs are critical, as they make up less than 1% of the ocean’s surface, but are home to 25% of all marine life.

Nature Tourism and Recreation

As travel becomes cheaper and more widespread, nature tourism and recreation become a persistent cause of disturbance to coastal ecosystems. Tourism brings millions of scuba divers, snorkelers, kite surfers, and bird watchers into direct contact with reefs, wetlands, and mangrove forests. Well-meaning nature enthusiasts may unknowingly damage habitats with their boat anchors, fishing gear, and improper diving or snorkelling practices.

Agriculture

Agriculture is a necessity for human sustenance that has unfortunate effects on coastal habitats. Fertilizer, sewage, and soil runoff are a direct cause of eutrophication. During this process, the excess nutrients from runoff, rich in nitrogen and phosphorus, stimulate growth of algae in what is called an “algal bloom”. Algal blooms block sunlight and deplete the water and reefs of oxygen, which is required by the zooxanthellae in coral to photosynthesize and remain alive. Almost 600 square miles of reef have disappeared every year since the 1960s. This means the reefs are disappearing twice as quickly as tropical rainforest are.

Aquaculture

Aquaculture – fish and shellfish farming – are responsible for severe declines of productive ecosystems. Aquaculture may alter natural drainage patterns, increase salinity, or pollute coastal waters with pollutants and sediments.

An ecosystem that has been significantly disturbed by aquaculture is the mangrove forest. Commercial shrimp farming is responsible for 25% of all mangrove destruction!

As habitats disappear, not only marine species but also human communities suffer from the loss of resources. Healthy mangrove forests provide a habitat and nursery for fish species, filter salt water, collect sediment and protect erosion, and act as a buffer zone and protection from the impacts of storms and floods. In the past decades, 35% of all mangrove forests have vanished. Such a drastic loss spells out an increased exposure to natural forces.

The Tasmanian wolf. The Javan tiger. The Caribbean monk seal. Baiji river dolphin. What do these animals all have in common? Answer: They’re extinct. Gone. And you can be sure that humans won’t be seeing any of these animals again. Extinction isn’t limited to exotic, legendary creatures. Even the passenger pigeon, known for delivering messages, the winged Hermes of World War One, is now extinct. As recently as the 1800s, the passenger pigeon was the most common bird in North America. Due to the large flocks, farmers began thinking of them as a threat. Once pigeon meat was commercialized, it was sold as a cheap source of protein. A massive hunting campaign followed and flocks of them were shot daily by the thousands and sent to New York. The last passenger pigeon, Martha, died at the Cincinnati Zoological Garden in 1914 at the age of 29.

The growing impact of human activities is causing a rapid loss of animal and plant biodiversity. Currently, the rate of animal extinction is 1,000 to 10,000 times higher than the natural extinction rate. According to a UN report on the state of the global environment, 25% of the world’s mammals face extinction by the year 2032. Some scientists predict that the world is about to face the sixth mass extinction. A mass extinction, in the paleontological sense, is diagnosed when the pace of extinction is significantly higher than the pace of origination. Over the past 540 million years, five mass extinctions have occurred, during which at least 75% of all animal species were destroyed due to natural causes. However, the threat of extinction today is caused by manmade influences including habitat loss, overhunting, overfishing, the spread of invasive species and viruses, pollution, and the frighteningly high expansion rate of the human population.

In the oceans, the rate of biodiversity destruction is cataclysmic. The endangerment of whale, dolphin, manatee, tuna, sea turtle, and shark species are on the rise. UNESCO reports claim that if significant changes are not implemented, more than half of all marine species may stand on the brink of extinction. Marine species, both live and dead, have significant financial value in the global market, however, and aside from ecotourism, these species are rarely attributed financial value in their natural environments. The financial benefits of catching and exploiting marine resources are a driving factor of the global marine trade. An estimated 50-80% of all life on Earth is found under the surface of the seas; the loss of marine life is not to be taken lightly.

There is a wide range of causes of marine species extinction and endangerment, such as habitat loss, acidification, atmospheric change, and pollution. The most dominant and influential threat, however, is overfishing. Overfishing is reported to be the greatest threat to marine biodiversity in all regions. Fish populations plummeted fastest during the initial years of commercial fishing, often before population drops were calculated. By now, the loss of fish stocks is conspicuous. A global study concludes that 90% of all large fish have disappeared from the oceans since 1960 as a result of industrial fishing practices such as long lining, bottom trawling, and dredging. The commercial fisheries have caused an overexploitation of fish stocks so severe that 13% of global fisheries have collapsed. The continued use of destructive fishing operations delays ecosystem and population recovery, and may even prevent it completely.

When the population of a species is reduced, the genetic variation is reduced along with it. This compromises the species’ ability to adapt to new environmental stresses and changes. Due to the interdependencies between species, the destruction of one can lead to the demise of others. When whole species are wiped out or remain at insignificant population levels, the stability of the whole ecosystem is under threat.